The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is a powerful graphics card with outstanding performance to deliver smooth, stutter-free gameplay on high refresh rate monitors. Find out whether it’s worth upgrading your gaming setup or not.
For as long as I can remember, AMD has been a long way behind Intel and Nvidia when it comes to GPUs and CPUs. However, for the first time in almost a decade, that tendency seemed to be changing owing to some significant arrivals from the AMD camp in July.
On July 7th, AMD released a slew of new hardware, including the 3rd Generation Ryzen processors and NAVI RDNA GPUs, one of which being the RX 5700 XT.
Consumers have anticipated the AMD RX 5700 XT since rumors of its impending release surfaced months ago. It was set to launch with their powerful new Ryzen series, and it was specifically built to compete with Nvidia’s RTX 2070. However, AMD had to shift its aim to the 2060 SUPER due to the launch of Intel’s SUPER Series — a line of GPUs that increased Performance power at no extra expense.
Fortunately for AMD, the RX 5700 XT was still a valid card with a slew of new capabilities not seen previously by the company. Unfortunately, this made choosing between the RX 5700XT and the Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER tricky for customers.
We’ll put the RX 5700XT to the test to see how it compares to the competition regarding pricing, Performance, cooling, and features.
Let’s not waste any more time and get right to work with that in mind.
|The manufacturing procedure (nm)||7|
|Transistors are a kind of semiconductor (billion)||10.3|
|Clock at the Start||1605|
|VRAM Transfer Rate||14000|
|Date of Publication||July 2019|
|Price of Publication||$399|
The RX 5700XT has some of the nicest aesthetics I’ve seen in a long time in terms of design. It has a sleek design with a dark gray (nearly black) color scheme accented by the red LED flashes in the logo.
The “dent,” as it’s been dubbed by many, has created some debate among consumers, with half of them loving it and the other half despising it. However, I think it looks pretty good – and AMD claims it provides much more than simply visual appeal. The dent is a cooling design element that allows the turbofan to be more effective in tight situations, such as SLI.
That hypothesis does not convince me, but I enjoy the design nonetheless. Overall, it’s difficult to criticize this GPU’s design; it’s attractive from every viewpoint.
As previously said, AMD has included several outstanding capabilities into the new NAVI GPU series to gain an advantage over their hated competitor, Nvidia. That said, let’s take a closer look at them to understand better what to anticipate from this incredible GPU.
Even though AMD made a lot of fuss about the 7nm manufacturing process utilized on the Radeon RX 5700XT, this isn’t the first time we’ve seen it on an AMD card — the RADEON VII holds the title. It is, however, the first time it has been utilized in conjunction with the RDNA architecture. The combination of the two is a strong indication that AMD has opted to adopt this production technique exclusively for gaming platforms for the first time. So, does the new architecture make a difference in gaming performance?
That is an excellent question. The RX 5700XT functions similarly to the RADEON VII when utilized with the RDNA architecture, despite being the weaker of the two cards in terms of Performance (and much less expensive). According to AMD, the new design will deliver a 25% Performance boost over a card with the same clock speed that employs the GCN architecture. It’s not awful.
Then, quickly discuss cooling. AMD claims that this card’s cooling system is superior to prior generation blower-style cards. However, at this point in the testing, it’s challenging to back up such statements. The fan isn’t the quietest in the world, but it’s not as noisy as some of AMD’s previous-generation cards — I’m looking at you, Vega.
One of the most noticeable differences between Navi and Vega is the new Compute Unit when it comes to Vega. The RNDA CU is built on ‘workgroup processors,’ which employ two compute units joined together to share resources and perform better in oversized workload circumstances. Despite sharing resources, the RDNA add units in Navi feature more dedicated silicon than the GCN CU from the previous generation.
Each CU will also be supplied with an additional schedular and scalar unit. In terms of Performance, the Navi CU can double the GPU’s instruction rate, resulting in a more efficient compute unit devoted only to gaming.
Unlike the Vega CU, which was designed for professional workloads, the Navi architecture is primarily focused on gaming Performance. This is fantastic news for all players.
So, now that we’ve gone over some of the characteristics of this card, it’s time to see how it performs in-game.
Before we get started, it’s worth touching on the displayed clock speeds and what you should expect in real-world situations. So, as you can see from the specs above, this card comes equipped with a “Clock at the Start,” “Clock Booster,” and “Game Timer” – with the Clock Booster being the most generous. When we tested our 5700XT, we rarely saw the clock speed reach the heights of the displayed Clock Booster. Our results showed that the Game Timer, on the other hand, was a much more realistic figure of what we could expect in real-world situations. So keep that in mind.
Anyway, now that the clock rates are out of the way, the 5700XT is an extraordinarily efficient GPU for 1440p gaming. It handled most of the games we threw at it on extreme settings with ease, delivering at least 60 frames per second in most cases. In titles like CS: GO, Rainbow Six Siege, F1 2019, and Far Cry, FPS often exceeded 100. More demanding titles, such as Metro Exodus, Assassin’s Creed, and Shadow Of The Tomb Raider, all witnessed decent 60-80FPS gameplay performance. So, altogether, it’s pretty decent.
Compared to the RTX 2060 SUPER, which this card is aimed at, it completely outperforms it in every circumstance. On average, you should expect a 10% gain across the board over the 2060 SUPER, which shocked me. In several games, it wasn’t that different from the 2070 SUPER. For example, there was a 2% difference in Assassin’s Creed and much less in Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Considering that the 2070 SUPER costs about $100 more, you can realize how valuable this card is – not to mention AMD’s brilliance.
Aside from the rivalry from Nvidia, how does the RX 5700XT compare to other AMD GPUs produced in recent years? It will come as no surprise to learn that the 5700XT tops the field in this regard. As an example, consider the Vega 64. Compared to the 5700XT, the Vega 64 – which cost roughly $499 when released – is slow. The 5700XT boosts performance by approximately 20% while using 20% less power. In terms of gaming performance, the 5700XT has 38% fewer compute units than the Vega 64, yet it still delivers 20% greater frame rates in-game.
The difference between the RADEON VII and the 5700XT is subtle, but both GPUs provide comparable gaming performance, with the 5700XT being much less costly. As a result, the RADEON VII is effectively outdated.
So, we’ve concluded. So, what’s our ultimate verdict on this GPU?
So, let’s make it brief. The 5700XT is not only a beautiful GPU in terms of style, but it’s also a powerhouse in terms of gaming performance. It not only eradicates other GPUs in its own family but also targets some of Nvidia’s greatest GPUs. In addition, the release of the updated RDNA architecture has rendered some of the 5700xT’s previous-generation GPUs obsolete.
Looking at the Nvidia lineup, it’s difficult to recommend their GPUs unless you have a pressing need for Real-time ray tracing capability. For example, in many games, the 2070 SUPER, a tremendously outstanding card, compete toe-to-toe with the RX 5700XT. The 2060 SUPER, on the other hand, is outclassed on practically every front.
So, do we believe this card is a good investment? Yes, that is my response. It not only gives fantastic gaming performance at 1080p, 1440p, and select 4K resolutions, but it also has fantastic looks, improved cooling, and overall good value for money. Again, AMD did a tremendous job.
If you have any questions about this post or the RX 5700XT, please leave them in the comments area below. Better still, why not visit our Community Hub, where you can debate all things graphics cards with like-minded people.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the RX 5700 XT equivalent to?
A: The RX 5700 XT is a beast of an entry-level graphics card. It’s compelling, but it will not play modern games at 60fps with ultra settings and 4K resolution. However, suppose you want to maintain gaming performance without sacrificing graphical fidelity. In that case, the RX 5500 XT should be your best bet as this model has equivalent performance while also providing enough power for 1080p gameplay.
Which is better, RTX 2070 Super or Rx 5700 XT?
A: The RTX 2070 Super is a more powerful card, but the RX 5700 XT has lower power consumption.
Is a 5700 XT high-end?
A: Unfortunately, that is not a specific question.
- Radeon RX 5700 xt drivers
- amd Radeon RX 5700 xt price
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 xt hash rate
- visiontek Radeon Rx 5700 xt review
- and Radeon RX 5700 price